UFG+Response+from+Tucker


 * Annotated Bibliography (5) 5 **
 * User’s Guide (10) 8 **
 * Several drafts + Final draft (15) 15 **
 * Reflection on the Process (10) 10 **

** Total(40) 38 **

**The review felt very professional, with just enough attention to plot and a concise evaluation of the acting. The handling of set and costumes felt a little superficial, a kind of "not bad" evaluation. I would think the emphasis on comedy //might// dictate the character of the set (elemental) and the exaggeration of make-up and costume (burlesque?) Instead of integrating them into the whole concept of the play, you make them afterthoughts.** **The User's Guide was a good outline, but not about the process. You said you had more to say about the process after writing the genre, and I did intend you to modify it according to your experience. I guess there was no time for that. I mentioned in class that there was a tension between the theory and practice of writing the genre, and I hoped you would integrate the two.** **Nevertheless, I agree this is a competent review with a measured, critical voice.**